Since I listed Stephen King as one of my favorite authors (and since I only got 5 hours sleep and no coffee in sight yet) I felt like I really should add something to this. First of all, my husband, like Anthony, has made the statement that he can't read Stephen King because he is much too verbose and does too much description. My husband read very very slowly, and frankly makes not so nice comments about me when he sees that I have finished my brand new Piers Anthony book in a couple of hours. Yet this is the same man who plowed through almost all of JRRT's works (he was in the middle of the Silmarillion when he had to start working after college and lost most of his free time). Tolkien, for crying out loud!!! We have a joke in our circle of friends about the length of Tolkien's descriptions - 4 pages to describe how an elf stepped on a blade of grass. And he says King's descriptions are too long, sheesh.
I'm one of those people who HAS to read. And I read voraciously. If I'm not in the middle of a book, or have a magazine I have been known to read product labels in the restroom. And I read fast (typical Xanth novel, start to finish is 2-4 hours). Luckily I also have a really cruddy memory so I can reread stuff after a year or so. But because of my reading habits, I have several levels of reading in my library which range from no-brainers (just something to keep me occupied until I get a new book), brain candy (sweet little fluff that is almost meaningless but tastes good - like Xanth), my "I want someone to force me to think books" (mostly Dan Brown), recently have gotten into reading classic sci-fi by some of the masters (like Asimov), just a whole range of stuff that is all dependent on how hard my brain wants to work.
Stephen King is in my "brain candy" section. No he's not Lovecraft (the ultimate in horror IMHO), but he makes a decent quick read that keeps me from rereading catalogs for a day or two. And he's prolific, which with my reading speed, I always appreciate.
Oh, and I would like to say on a totally different note that JK Rowling would definitely get my vote for Best author of the milennium. Not cuz she's that great an author (although she is a good author and I love my HP books), but simply because of the surge in the DESIRE to read due to her books. She could write absolute schlock as far as I am concerned and still be the greatest author currently living. My husband hasn't read anything for fun in the past 10 years (since the Sil), and he actually grabbed my copy of Book 6 and read the hardback version, because we weren't financially able to get him his audiobook version (he only started on audiobooks this year, and was I happy when he did - I can't understand not reading for fun). And my cousin is one of the typical products of the American school system who couldn't enjoy reading thing beyond Calvin and Hobbes. In the past two years, he has read all of the Harry Potter books, most of Dan Brown's, and is currently working his way through Narnia. It's unbelievable to me.
Dang - I rambled. Going to go find coffee now. Sorry bout this. *grins*