Change? No. Unless he meant change back to the Clinton years. His first three cabinet selections were part of, or involved with, the Clinton cabinet. There is no change coming.
If I went to a job interview, and I told them that I would make major changes to their company and make it profitable, and they hired me, what would happen to me after a few months when I had not fulfilled the promises made? I would be fired. Why can we not do the same to the President?
As for the press, I hate them. Not just the 'in your face' bias of those people on MSNBC/Fox/CNN/NBC/ABC etc.; they at least tell you where they are coming from so you are in no doubt about their political leanings. I hate those members of the press who try to pass themselves off as unbiased, unaffiliated reporters. They use subtle words that may seem innocuous, but gently push people in one direction or another. Example (this is an actual case, only the names have been changed because I cannot remember them off hand): two judges running for the Supreme Court of WI, one Liberal, the other Conservative. The description in the paper was: "Judge A, who is aligned with the liberal group Lib, and Judge B, who has ties with conservative group Con....." Seems fairly innocent and fair. Both judge's affiliations are being exposed. Good reporting. But look at the very careful selection of the wording. You can be aligned with the center of the Milky Way (i.e. heading through the Universe in the same direction), but still be 15,000 light years away. But if you have ties with something, you have direct contact and will most likely do as that group wants.
There are no reporters any more. There are just editorialists gently pushing their propoganda.
Angus
