I see your point about making a strong fruit mel and then blending that with a traditional. That might be the way I go, I am not a huge fan of sugar, water, and fruit wines. Typically for me they lack body and complexity. But I wasnt sure if it was still considered a melomel if you blended a mead with a sugar/fruit wine...
In this instance I am trying to keep the honey notes in the forefront with a subtle fruit character in the mix. I was thinking i would better be able to control the amount of fruit character present in the final mead if I blended it into it seperate after fermentation...
I've recently blended two of my 'mistakes' and am fairly happy with the results.
I made several 1 gallon cherry melomel batches, each with 3 lbs of honey. One was fermented with a pound of whole cherries, one with a blended black cherry juice (cherry, apple and pear juices), and one with pure black cherry juice.
Not surprisingly, they all fermented very sweet, albeit with fairly high alcohol contents. To 'dry them out', i am blending them with 'plain' mead (also of fairly high alcohol %). They all need aging, but they taste much better with less cherry. Two of them (the ones made with juice) taste more like plum wine on their own.
One of them (the one made with pure black cherry juice instead of water) is so dark I call it Black Hole Brew, because not even light can escape the bottle. I'm serious. A high-power flashlight behind the gallon jug gives not even a hint of light through the liquid.
What I should have done, I'm afraid, was to do as fatbloke suggests and to do the primary ferment with enough honey to get to the alcohol %, I want, let it ferment dry, then secondary ferment on top of the fruit. Don't know how I'd work the juice into this equation, but I'll burn that bridge when I come to it. <grin>
Maze on,
Joe